The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement claims that the human mind is and always will be superior to machines. That is an ambiguous claim to make. In what aspect is the human mind superior? It can be in regards to creativity or computation power. On the other hand it states that machines are only tools of human mind, but it neglects the very purpose of tools, which is to help us in the aspects that we as humans lack. Due to these contradictions I cannot support this statement in its entiriety.
The human mind is the source of the machine. That is an impeachable fact, and thus some argue that the creation cannot surpass its creator, however, I disagree. In the modern world and at the speed that technology is advancing, it is quite possible for the machine to surpass the human mind if it has not already. The advent of Artificial Intelligence has a lot of innovator such as Ellon Musk on edge. It is argued that within two or three decade, the AI, as we call it, will be so suffisticated that it will change how we think, and this is not a sign of superiority of human mind to the machine. In addition, to answer the party that claims machines lack creativity and will never catch up to the human mind, the very purpose of the artificial intelligence is to duplicate this creativity and smart that our minds posses. A good example of this is the android named Sophie that has proven to be able to keep up conversations as they are thrown at her. These facts do not align with the statement.
A more familiar aspect of the machine is its capability for great speed. The amount of calculations that a computer cheap can do is much greater than what we as humans are able to perform. If the algorithems of artificial intelligence for learning can process data at such tremendous speeds, it is quite possible for the machines to learn much faster than humanly possible. This reminds me of the supercomputer that was designed for playing chess. Imagine a computer having the ability to learn the rules of a game such as chess and to be able to compete with world class chess masters and even to defeat them. This ability is not something that can be neglected in analyzing the above statement. This Immense computational power at the disposal of the machine is surely a tool that can empower them to surpass the human mind.
On another perspective, the statement suggests that because the machines are tools they simply cannot be better that the mind that has designed them. Well, first let’s look at what a tool does. A tool is an apparatus that compensates for the lack of ability of the human body or mind. In this regard one can argue that tools have already surpassed us in their intended goal. Now if this concept is applied to the machine that is a tool for the mind, it can easily be said that the machine is superior to the human mind in its perspective field. As of right now, most of these machines focus on the speed of computation but as time passes by, their focus will shift into higher thinking levels and it won’t be much longer that they are able to surpass the human mind in every aspect.
The ability of the machine and whether it can surpass the human mind is not a matter of if but of when. With the breakthroughs in both artificial intelligence frontier and in hardware that are being developed for the machines, it is not very difficult to imagine a world where the machines have made the thinking process of humanity obsolete. The question that remains is how do we manage that future?
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 62
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large, highly diversified company."Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two different regions. The buildings were erected by two differe 55
- Summerise the points made by the lecturer and how they refute the author s points 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...t is the human mind superior? It can be in regards to creativity or computation power. On the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun innovator seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of innovators'.
Suggestion: a lot of innovators
...e advent of Artificial Intelligence has a lot of innovator such as Ellon Musk on edge. It is argue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
.... It is argued that within two or three decade, the AI, as we call it, will be so suff...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 30.0 11.3162921348 265% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 76.0 33.0505617978 230% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2871.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 634.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52839116719 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01790360848 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56166813184 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410094637224 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0109712192 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298213261205 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922547943321 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747042786289 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202125653436 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512494281565 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.