Some people argue that companies and private individuals, not government, should pay the bill of pollution clean up. To what extent do you.
It is true that stakeholders in business sector should pay the bill of pollution clean up. While some people say companies and private individuals are institutions which should pay it, I think government is the side that has responsibility to solve pollution problem.
Industry activity is one of factors that makes earth condition bad. It produces pollution and creates products that can make global warming, such as hair dryer, refrigerator, air conditioner, hair spray, and perfume. In Indonesia, President has created regulation to solve it. He decided rule for companies in order to implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as their obligation program. It has purposes to keep environment and help society from uncomfortable condition caused by them. Many kinds of CSR programs that can execute, such as planting trees in large area and cleaning river from rubbish. In my opinion, executing CSR is one of evidences that companies are responsible for environment and they give contribution to government and country.
In any case, President should take action to reduce pollution and pay the bill to fix it. In Indonesia, government get much money from taxpayer such as individual person and corporation. Tax is income resource that is used to fulfill country’s need, such as infrastructure and citizen prosperity. If companies and private individuals have to pay again then they must execute CSR, I think it is very hard for them. Government can determine allocation cost for environment sector from APBN. As a leader, President can make specific rule for CSR regulation. For example, industries have to spend around 60 percent from CSR’s consideration to focus in environment, such as pollution clean up and 40 percent cost allocation to other activities, for instance health, education, and sport.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against who should pay the bill of pollution clean up, but I think government is an institution that become the first player to solve it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2013-11-03 | Mita Puspasari | 70 | view |
- Air travel only benefits the richest people The majority of people get no advantage from development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagrams below show how chocolate is made and how the price of a chocolate bar is divided up among those involved in the process. 70
- Reading is more important for developing imaginations and language skills than television. Do you agree or disagree? 75
- The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980, 2000 and the world’s top ten exporters of fish in 2000. 75
Sentence: In Indonesia, government get much money from taxpayer such as individual person and corporation.
Description: The fragment government get much is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace get with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 320 350
No. of Characters: 1647 1500
No. of Different Words: 178 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.147 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.976 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 114 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.824 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.477 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.319 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.481 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.066 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5