In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Cars have become an integral part of our society as a result of people’s need for fast-moving. Some people will agree that the number of cars will decrease in the nearest future, while other would disagree stating that they will remain the most common mode of transportation. In my opinion, this number is not going to be falling down in twenty years for two important reasons.
First, cars save our time letting us use it for other needs. Obviously, people of past centuries have created a car to manage time in a more effective way. If you have a four-wheeler, your to-do list for every day will contain more activities than the one if you didn’t have a car. For example, when I was a lyceum student, I had to walk a lot to reach different departments of my lyceum, which costed me much time, made me be late for classes, and was exhausting me even if I used public means of transportation. I even remember my constant complaints to my friend about the fact that long-lasting walks tired me out and that I was not able to be on time for my extra classes on mathematics and physics, and my teachers used to scold me for that. Finally, my parents decided to buy me a car and I became the happiest person in the world since I got a chance to expand the list of my daily activities and the length of the distances I had to pass stopped bothering me. This present has allowed me to realize that if you have a car, time and kilometers do not pose a challenge to you.
Second, people, by nature, are lazy and physical activity is not so attractive for them. For some people it is better to get to the place by car, but not by bicycle or by their own legs. For instance, long time ago I had a pretty nice conversation with a stranger. We brought up the topic of urbanization and globalization, as well as technology development. He told me that all the inventions that continue to be created serve people to facilitate their lives. Take the same cars, they were created in response to people’s request to overcome long distances consuming minimum energy. Undoubtedly, it costs energy but in the lesser amounts. As we can see, people haven’t invented a car for the purpose of its speedy elimination, but in reverse, they aimed at making their lives easier.
In summary, cars benefit our lives by making it more convenient. Not only have they reduced the time of traversing long distances, but they also give us a simple way to save our physical energy. Cars have revolutionized our lives and we should all support their continued development and use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 70
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 80
- Neighbors are the people who live near us. In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good neighbor? Use specific details and examples in your answer. 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for everyday'?
Suggestion: for everyday
...ou have a four-wheeler, your to-do list for every day will contain more activities than the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in summary, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 43.0788530466 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57792207792 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77614848865 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541125541126 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1905630865 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180984767452 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532923842925 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475967938856 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114444959997 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621847171957 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.