Nowadays, people throw away old things and adopt new things. Does the disadvantage of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages?
Presently, in the modern world, novelty is in human nature. Sometimes it is genuine, however many times it is a temptation only. Those who adopt new things come under rapidly growing category, called throwaway society. It is very clear that disadvantages certainly outweigh its perceived and hypothetical advantages. This essay provides the empirical evidences to support the above notion.
To begin with, today’s throwaway society has generated many problems. To enumerate, to satisfy never ending craze of being better and different, people buy new things, this leads to loss of money. So they work hard to earn more money, eventually victims of this trend becomes materialistic. People in race to earn more tend to move away from ethics and moral values which is big loss to society and today’s world. Moreover, throwaway society is responsible for collection of waste and to manage this dump becomes headache for government. These thrown away items contribute to pollution, most of such items are non biodegradable and hazardous for ecosystem. For example, many countries dump tonnage of waste in sea killing marine life.
On the other hand, some economists support perceived advantages. Firstly, throwaway society encourages growth of manufacturing, technology and research related industries. Secondly, as it provides employment opportunities in various sectors hence growth curve is seen in global economy. Thirdly, adoption of the new things helps in improving standard of life by facilitating more products of comfort. To illustrate, many new advanced automatic gadgets are introduced in market every day which makes life more convenient.
To recapitulate, it is evident that the concept of throwaway society is harmful to the world in so many ways. It has adverse effects on the social setup, ecosystem and environment. Thus, disadvantages of throwaway society outscore its perceived economic advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-04 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
- There is a gap in standard of living between countryside and cities How true is this in your country What measures should be taken to reduce this gap 69
- You lost something and someone found it and sent it you Writing a letter to that person Thanking the person Explain how you must have lost it Explain what was there in it and why it was important to you 90
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 89
- Some people trust their first impressions about a person s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct Other people do not judge a person s character quickly because they believe first impressions are wrong Which attitude do you a 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide What is the cause of this What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58503401361 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00514775768 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218195244145 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555624597654 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563983882889 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125308985417 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196041904027 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.