Some people believe that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today’s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There was an ignited debate in recent years to argue for the importance of educational setting. Opponents to orthodox perspective believe that the qualities that could pave the way for success are collected from other environments rather than traditional education. In my humble opinion, university does contribute <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">partly </span>to one’s sweet fruits, other required abilities, however, come down from real-life practices.
On the one hand, current education systems are in desperate need of being reformed. Despite the concept accepted for generations that learning is the shortcut to eradicate the gap of the circumstance which one was born, our education system is way behind on realistic expectations. For example, the rising reports on graduates' lack of practical knowledge forced more and more universities to include computer science and STEM in their curriculum no matter what their student's major is. This move could be admitted as education’s failure amid changing realistic expectations. In this light, the skeptics have the rights to declare that current higher education does not catch the pace of time any longer.
On the other hand, it is inevitable that practical experiences do contribute mainly to one’s success. For years, people are covered the eyes by a misconception that knowledge learned from higher education is enough for our career. In real life, however, practical experiences are the best mentor in orienting our career, verifying our knowledge, or even repeatedly warning us about the traps lurking in every corner of our job. For example, an employee has to spend time accumulating experience or leadership before reaching higher ranks. Furthermore, this employee is required to prove his ability in confronting the storms to comes also. Such kinds of these qualities are hardly found in any higher education today.
In conclusion, there is a widening gap between higher education and realistic expectation that forces the authority to pay attention. I firmly believe that humans today do no longer depend on the knowledge taught in universities to enjoy their own fruits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 84 | view |
- The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 89
- Most of the world's problems could be solved by international cooperation. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- The money spent by governments on space programs would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...lity in confronting the storms to comes also. Such kinds of these qualities are hard...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58787878788 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18985996739 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7678535 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128077656555 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427934075537 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390669477257 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079523988401 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00880120729525 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.