Some people believe that the qualities a person needs to become successful in today’s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There was an ignited debate in recent years to argue for the importance of educational setting. Opponents to orthodox perspective believe that the qualities that could pave the way for success are collected from other environments rather than traditional education. In my humble opinion, university does partly contribute to one’s sweet fruits, other required abilities, however, come down from real-life practices.
On the one hand, current education systems are in desperate need of being reformed. Despite the concept accepted for generations that learning is the shortcut to eradicate the gap of the circumstance which one was born, our education system is way behind on realistic expectations. For example, the rising reports on graduates' lack of practical knowledge forced more and more universities to include computer science and STEM in their curriculum no matter what their student's major is. This move could be admitted as education’s failure amid changing realistic expectations. In this light, the skeptics have the rights to declare that current higher education does not catch the pace of time any longer.
On the other hand, it is inevitable that practical experiences do contribute mainly to one’s success. For years, people are covered the eyes by a misconception that knowledge learned from higher education is enough for our career. In real life, however, practical experiences are the best mentor in orienting our career, verifying our knowledge, or even repeatedly warning us about the traps lurking in every corner of our job. For example, an employee has to spend time accumulating experience or leadership before reaching higher ranks. Furthermore, this employee is required to prove his ability in confronting the storms to comes also. Such kinds of these qualities are hardly found in any higher education today.
In conclusion, there is a widening gap between higher education and realistic expectation that forces the authority to pay attention. I firmly believe that humans today do no longer depend on the knowledge taught in universities to enjoy their own fruits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 89 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Inpu Nguyen | 84 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- In your opinion, which period of time is the most difficult in a person’s life:1. Childhood 2. Teenage 3. Adulthood 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?“Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past” 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: people buy things not because of need but because others also buy them. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3630, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...lity in confronting the storms to comes also. Such kinds of these qualities are hard...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4457.0 1615.20841683 276% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 500.0 315.596192385 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.914 5.12529762239 174% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 9.97426187745 2.80592935109 355% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1149.3 506.74238477 227% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.3 1.60771543086 143% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 330.539150748 49.4020404114 669% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 342.846153846 106.682146367 321% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 38.4615384615 20.7667163134 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0959040631674 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469068400562 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297690623033 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959040631674 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.8 13.0946893788 304% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -26.31 50.2224549098 -52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 19.3 7.44779559118 259% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 26.4 11.3001002004 234% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 34.99 12.4159519038 282% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 25.0 9.78957915832 255% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 25.0 10.7795591182 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.