about a series step of products procedure
The chart shows the total number of minutes which UK residents used on three types of telephone calls between 1999 and 2002.<br>Local fixed line calls were the highest throughout the period, rising from 72 billion minutes in 1995 to just under 90 billion in 1998. After peaking at 90 billion in the following year, these calls had fallen back to the 1995 figure by 2002.<br>On the other hand, there was a steadily increase in minutes which used in National and international fixed line calls, from 38 million minutes in 1995 to 62 million in 2002. That was just lower than local calls approximate to 10 billion minutes in the last year of the period.<br>However, the most significant increase in the minutes related to mobile calls, which started at 4 billion minutes in 1995 to 45 billion in 2002, was remarkable that the 2002 figure was threefold by 1999.<br>To sum up, although the local fixed-line calls were the most popular in 2002, the gap between the three categories had narrowed considerably over the second half of the period in question.
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 89
- Some people said that giving aid to poorer countries has more negative effects than positive effects, to what extend do you agree or disagree ? 56
- All over the world, the number of overweight people is growing. What doyou feel are the main causes of this? What are the effects? 56
- about a series step of products procedure 11
- about a series step of products procedure 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...y 2002.
On the other hand, there was a steadily increase in minutes which used in National and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87709497207 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76124630078 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 8.94146341463 34% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 59.0 22.4926829268 262% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 107.789919133 43.030603864 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 291.0 112.824112599 258% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 59.6666666667 22.9334400587 260% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 16.3333333333 5.23603664747 312% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.4 13.2329268293 237% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.9 10.3012195122 232% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 25.6 10.9970731707 233% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.