Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Smoking has a lot of negative effects on the smokers themselves or the people who are near them, breathing in the polluted air around.
The chemical in cigarette could increase the risks of cancer, damage the lung tissue, hair loss and so on. People how chose to smoke are maybe ok with its consequences, but others that just happened to be around them shouldn't be bothered with the smoke and its unwanted harms. The cigarette's smoke specially effects on pregnant young children, elderlies , people some kind of disease, pregnant women and their fetus. So, it should be banned around this groups even more than others.
Despite all of these issues, it may be a little unrealistic and less practical to ban smoking in all the public places. Personally, I think it is better to restrict them in really crowded places, inside of public buildings, theaters or cinemas and places with a lot of vulnerable individuals like hospitals, near schools and care centers and so on.
In my opinion, it might be tolerable in less crowded places with open space like parks and seaside if the smokers could keep their distance from other people who may be bothered.
In addition to all the issues mentioned above, there is also the matter of wasting the cigarettes. Cigarette butts must be trashed because their effects in environment are severe. They won't decompose for a long time and will reduce the vegetation of the soil.
In general, I think smoking in public places should be restricted, others are not responsible for the smokers choice and thereby must not be bothered by it. Also, mother nature shouldn't pay the price. So, we must be restrict about trashing them too.
- how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 75
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range fore the year 1990 and 2010. 56
- to what extent has the internet made our life more convenient? 61
- the flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourist walking in the countryside for the environment 40
- one of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing.do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...rs that just happened to be around them shouldnt be bothered with the smoke and its unwa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 354, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts on pregnant young children, elderlies , people some kind of disease, pregnant w...
^^
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...r fetus. So, it should be banned around this groups even more than others. Despite...
^^^^
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... be bothered by it. Also, mother nature shouldnt pay the price. So, we must be restrict ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, really, so, i think, in addition, in general, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86267605634 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50876947614 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595070422535 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6020882349 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227934164024 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756345248308 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598673084586 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117468315504 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438513535315 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.