The charts compare 5 different sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990.
The charts compare 5 different sources of energy namely oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and hydroelectricity power in the terms of the percentage of energy generated in the USA in 1980 and 1990.
As can be seen from the charts that oil consistently dominated the energy production rankings, while the percentage of energy yielded from hydroelectric lagged far behind.
A closer look at the data reveals that 42% of total energy in the US came from oil, which was much higher than 26% for (the percentage of energy generated from) natural gas and 22 % for (that from) coal. The figure for hydroelectricity and nuclear marked similar quantities, at 5% for each.
It’s noticeable that the percentage of energy from oil decreased significantly, falling to 33% in 1990. Likewise, the figure for natural gas went down slightly to 25%. The proportion of energy generated from coal witnessed a reserve trend with a moderate increase to 27%. In a similar way, the figure for nuclear went up, rising to 10%. The proportion of hydroelectric remained stable, at 5% throughout the surveyed period.
- The charts compare 5 different sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990. 67
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving internet access. Why is it happening and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree about this opinion 78
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are 5 different sources of energy namely oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and hydr...
^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istently dominated the energy production rankings, while the percentage of energy...
^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... trend with a moderate increase to 27%. In a similar way, the figure for nuclear went up, rising...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07777777778 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.961027032 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544444444444 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3140897071 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244476309932 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101760014379 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167563852898 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200716603372 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.207016351544 0.0819641961636 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.