The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India.
The chart compares the percentage of consuming food by four different types worldwide in comparison with china and india in 2008
Overall, it is clear that while the number of processed food worldwide was the largest more than china and india, the opposite was true for nuts and seeds. Also, the percentage of nuts and seed in worldwide was the lowest during the period.
According to the graph, consuming vegetables and fruits in china was higher at 32% more than in the world and india. The percentage of processed food in the world was the highest number 41%, compared to 34% and 39% in china and india respectively. The proportion of animal food in india 27% was higher than 1% of worldwide, 8% of china. By contrast, nuts and seed accounted for 4% which was the lowest consumption of food as opposed to 19% and 11% in china and india respectively in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | sandeep kumari | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Toghrul Azizli | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Toghrul Azizli | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | rika_lavarose | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | Phung Quang Tuan | 61 | view |
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 61
- Older people often say that their life was better in the past than it is now Do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 61
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 67
- The chart below shows the Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... comparison with china and india in 2008 Overall, it is clear that while the numb...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65359477124 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55430991156 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496732026144 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5605976896 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290180037265 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159191757488 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818348789154 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2190201488 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102537722417 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.