Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Laws of a country change regularly over time. Admittedly, the role of the federation is to introduce new laws to the society which help people to live in a safe environment. However, a group of people who are subjected to the law could think that it is not fair enough and the government should conduct a reform to change it. Now protested people are in dilemma, where they should obey the unjust laws. I believe that in most cases people should obey the law but there are some expectations.
First, people are not able to have long-term and wide perspective meaning that when they are exposed to law, they merely see their situation and think that the law is not fair. As a matter of fact, Law scientist conducts various research to understand the effects of a law on society. Accordingly, if it has an adverse effect, they will rule out it to find a proper one. On the other hand, If anyone who does not have enough information protest against law and resist it, then we will live in a country that is not safe anymore. It is worth to mention that a country with bad constitutions is better than a country without one.
Secondly, protesting against the law is rational in some countries and in some cases. Researchers of the law field, conduct various research through the year and propose their idea to the policy-makers and make it available on the media. However, governments especially <span style="color: rgb(34, 34, 34); font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: xx-large; white-space: normal;">tyranny </span>ones resist to change the law. In these situations, people should protest against it. Consider 50 years ago when death penalties were privilege all over the world. Although many newspaper articles included an article against it, the government were completely against it to change it because of many reasons such as religious. When people started demonstrations in the US and all over the world, policy-makers decided to be against their will and make some reforms. It should be stressed that this success would not be achieved without a protest of people in the world.
In conclusion, I believe that people should obey almost all the laws of a country but on some occasion, it is not rational to obey an unjust law.
- construction in countrysides (attempt 2) 76
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.To what extent do you agree or disagree 50
- A company should identify those employees who excel at entry level positions and place an emphasis on their training and professional development will increase employees' personal fulfillment and enable them to serve the company to the best of their 33
- Do you agree or disagree? It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Young people today are less dependent on their parents than young people in the past 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...pace: normal;'>tyranny ones resist to change the law. In these situ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not rational to obey an unjust law.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, in most cases, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93157894737 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27227503941 2.79657885939 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486842105263 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.269285785 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6315789474 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11210010317 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391438622931 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325751572006 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842880545022 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272518212514 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.