summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contradict points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not globalization is the benefit to the world. While the reading states that the globalization significantly useful to the society in various ways with the commercial connection to the regions of the world. the lecture refutes this, saying that it is the hard topic and it is not necessarily a good thing.
First of all, the reading climes globalization enable the low cost of living because the labor in the developing country are less pricey as a result the products are cheaper. However, the lecture argues that there is no job stability in developed countries. He illustrated that, when the USA trade with Mexico, the television manufacturer company shifted their business to Mexico because of inexpensive workers, eventually no jobs for Americans.
In addition to that, the reading makes the argument that the globalization release high-quality products with less expensive because of the competition. The lecture counter this point by stating it is the danger to rely on other countries. He explained with 2008 recession as an example. He mentioned that the American 2008 financial crush not only impact on the US market, it also spoil other countries like Germany.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that mutual relationship between countries put pressure on the government to maintain environmental safety. The lecture cast doubt on this point by saying it is the doubt that globalization improves environmental safety. He mentioned that it increases the air pollution rather safety.
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 70
- the argument on the accuracy of Chevalier de Seingalt memoir. summarize the points made on the lecture and the reading and how the professor refutes the reading claims. 70
- Early twentieth century Chaco construction purpose. the professor refutes the reading claims mentioned in the passage. 3
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- four day work week vs five day work week 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not globalization is the benefit to the wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...balization is the benefit to the world. While the reading states that the globalizati...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...connection to the regions of the world. the lecture refutes this, saying that it is...
^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spoils'?
Suggestion: spoils
...t only impact on the US market, it also spoil other countries like Germany. Lastly, ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l other countries like Germany. Lastly, the reading passage argues that mutual r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30081300813 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95514755724 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7877137177 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.307692308 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115969156325 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447941868684 0.0996497079465 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396695263829 0.0662205650399 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0698796217977 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225127597234 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.