Participation by 5 to 14 years old in sleceted leisure activities in Australia.
The bar chart illustrates the information about involvement of children in spare time activities like bike riding, watching tv etcetera in Australia. The data is calibrated in percentage.
From the above bar chart, it is lucid that both boys and girls show a great interest in watching tv which is near about 100 percent. Moreover, the interest of boys in playing electronic games is 20 percent more than girls that id 60 percent. However, in bike riding 75 percent boys are involved in free time and the girls participation remained same as in computer games.
On the other side, both boys and girls tend least interest in art and craft activities which is 55 percent by boys and near about 40 percent by girls. In skateboarding, 40 percent boys contribute which is 10 percent more than girls.
Overall, both boys and girls tend more interest in watching tv and least interest in skateboarding.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 78
- Do children behave better when tvey are punished or rewarded 89
- Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status, 1989 - 1999 67
- Parents are the best teachers. Do yo agree or disagree. 56
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian 67
Comments
The topic is not complete, so
The topic is not complete, so it got only 1 score. It is actually around 6.5 out of 9.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 317, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'girls'' or 'girl's'?
Suggestion: girls'; girl's
... boys are involved in free time and the girls participation remained same as in compu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'tend the least'.
Suggestion: tend the least
... On the other side, both boys and girls tend least interest in art and craft activities wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91503267974 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76404911929 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522875816993 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8083003646 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0452629243368 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227718288025 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331421770801 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336037077469 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326704478535 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.