impact of smoking on society
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the literature impact on current society. While the reading states that current studies reveal the young adult not show interest to read novels consequently its impact on their culture, tradition, and life of the literature. The lecture refutes this, saying that although it is true, it is less impact on today's generation.
First of all, the reading climes that reading enhances the intellectual stimulation like as language command, improve imagination and so on. since the people reading less, they are missing all important benefits of the reading. However, the lecture argues that in fact, it is true that youngsters have less interest in reading novels but high quality and well written scientific journals influence the adults and improve their knowledge. Furthermore, the professor states that they are well written and peer-reviewed article enhances intellectual stability as like as novels.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that people rather studying literature, they are reading the unauthenticated bookes and other kinds of entertainment programs such as watching television and watching music. The lecture counters this point by stating, of course, it is true that people spending less time with books but broadcasting and listening to music also improve the culture. According to the professor, listening to music and watch movies is not wasting because it reveals the many forms of experience speak directly.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that the situation of less reading books often impact many writers today. because they are not getting enough support and encouragement. The lecture refutes this clime by pointing out that it is true that there is less support but don't blame the audience because the writing style is difficult to understand. Moreover, the professor says the most of the writers are from the past so it is hard to understand current generation people and easy for old people.
- reasons about an asteroid could be the best colonization option 71
- Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin 71
- us wood company eco-friendly certification 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Modern transportation and shipping has made the world a better place to live. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not the literature impact on current societ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...though it is true, it is less impact on todays generation. First of all, the reading ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... books often impact many writers today. because they are not getting enough support and...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... is true that there is less support but dont blame the audience because the writing ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, well, while, in addition, in fact, of course, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32063492063 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71524163989 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530158730159 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9017635216 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06452816374 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0566900284245 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261623419281 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422576036554 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436842233627 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551268893725 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 63.6247240618 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.