TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that craved stone ball used for 3 main purposes such as using for hunting, as scale stone and as social purpose. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that carved stone used for hunting or fighting; in contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that weapon that used for hunting must have a space that people can handle them as handle excess, but these stones do not have handle excess. Also in this carved stone, we do not see any cracked space that became a sign of the hunting.
Secondly, the reading passage argues that people used this stone for the system of weight and measures; conversely, what the speaker believes is different. She points that carved stones have the same shape, but they do not have the same weight. Because these stones were made by the different type of stone with different density, as the result the weight of stone was different and people could not use them for scale.
Finally, according to the reading, carved stones were used as social purpose. However, the lecturer states that the pattern of these stones was a simple shape. Furthermore, ancient people burned famous people with their position and worthy things. But, we can not see the carved stone with people who burned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-03 | Evelinamur | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95798319328 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20931705387 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6002494927 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06452816374 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376158165447 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151845744309 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085977210449 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234824577908 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532511417484 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.