the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
The line graph compare how many people went to the movie theater in the UK tend to four aged groups from 1990 to 2010
It is clean that the attendance in cinema increased over the period shown. Especially, the younger people active in movie going than the older people. Exceptionally, for a drop slightly from 1995 to 2000.
By the year 1990, the highest viewer was about 39 percent in 14 to 24 aged and the lowest was 15 percent in 44 to 54 aged. Following five years between 1995 and 2000, there was a peaked the bottom of all figure's aged.
Over a five-year period from 2005 from 2010, the group of 14 to 24 aged peaked at 51 percent was the commonest throught period watching film in cinema . While the percentages of 24 to 34 aged also went up. Therefore, both groups 34 to 44 aged and 44 to 54 aged had remained stable trend in about 30 percent.
- using modern connect are useful now aday. agree and disagree 84
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 77
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
- the line graph gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... throught period watching film in cinema . While the percentages of 24 to 34 aged ...
^^
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rought period watching film in cinema . While the percentages of 24 to 34 aged also w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30434782609 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28198948168 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8141626574 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.625 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919073030258 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368517361664 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838846128373 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688566723716 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637491334319 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.66 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.