The two maps compare and contrast the changes of a small coastal village to a large tourist attraction in Europe from 1974 to 2004.
As is highlighted shown in the maps, the local population witnessed an enormous increase over the 31 years from only 12,000 to 80,000 and the village also had the possibility to serve accommodations for 50,000 tourists.
In the year 2004, in the East and the West of the original village, a huge number of hotels were built along the coastline, while where the harbour stood, there used to be the sandy beach for tourist activities.
Moreover, the woodland and the olives in the West of the area were destroyed to make way for the golf and the farms growing fruits and vegetables for hotels. The given period also experienced the enlargement of two villages in the North-West and the North-East of this area and the appearance of new shops and the main road as well.
On this basis, it may be concluded that there are plenty of differences between the two maps in every location.
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Proportional Government Spending on Arts in 1995 and 2005 84
- In many parts of the world today there is a profitable market for products which lighten or whiten people skin outline the reasons for using such products and discuss what effects they have in terms of health and society. 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Proportional Government Spending on Arts in 1995 and 2005 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68156424581 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58854011621 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2021116211 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8333333333 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103350319901 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495396123395 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376604956136 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521030563576 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427316798839 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.