Percentage of car ownership in Great Britain according to household.
The line graph indicates the proportion of possessive car per household in Great Britain over a period of 40 years from 1961 to 2001.
Overall, it is obvious that the percentages of one car and two cars and more ownership increased during the period shown. Meanwhile, the percentage of families having no car decreased significantly.
In 1961, the percentages of one car and two cars and more possession were nearly 30% and 10% respectively, whereas households owned no car accounted for the highest proportion with 70%. Between 1961 and 2001, the percentage of two cars and more owned per household rose sharply in 1971 with 30% before going up gradually and reached the peak at about 49% in 2001.
One car and no car owned per household had the same percentage in 1971 with around 38%. From 1971 to 2001, the percentage of no car ownership went down dramatically and hit the lowest point in 2001 at 10%, while the figure for one car ownership stayed the same from 1971 to 1981 at about 38% and then it hit the highest point in 2001 with approximately 39%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 81
- Percentage of car ownership in Great Britain according to household 84
- People aim to achieve the balance between their work and lives but few people achieve it What are the problems if people try to achieve this balance How to overcome these problems 65
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68449197861 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66387463814 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497326203209 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7476761523 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358129877403 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195534530501 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046314935447 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234539990774 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247753542411 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.