Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about which is the key point to win in sports between individuals and teams qualities and personal attitudes. In my opinion, the two factors are equally important.
The level of individuals and teams are the basic factors to decide whether an athlete can achieve the success or not. Some people believe that only have strong bodies and excellent team that can get qualifications to compete with others, especially in some high level competitions such us Olympics. For instance, the famous basketball player Michael Jordan who has amazing talent but still insist on intensity training in order to keep healthy and dynamic brain to face the competitions which may bring enormous harm to body. In addition, in many team sports just like football and hockey games, there also need a complete and wall-coordinated team instead of relying on personal's performance, because this will increase the risk of failure.
On the other hand, we have to acknowledge the spirit’s power works equally well. Competitions always accompany with huge pressure so athletes have to own an excellent mental quality, meanwhile they also need desire for honor, otherwise they can not work hard in their daily training or achieve champion in sports. For example, players’ confidence can be used to fight challenges.
In my view, psychological quality, positive practice are a good team are all impact on competition's consequence. We should not ignore everyone of them. Mental attitude is able to help player perform more stable and a good team can provide well guarantees to every individual. In conclusion, we should pay attention to every aspect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | shell | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | DuongAnh | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-07 | Frank Chen | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 84
- nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 61
- Some people think the most important thing about being rich is helping other people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e two factors are equally important. The level of individuals and teams are t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 676, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'personals'' or 'personal's'?
Suggestion: personals'; personal's
...-coordinated team instead of relying on personals performance, because this will increase...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'competitions'' or 'competition's'?
Suggestion: competitions'; competition's
...ctice are a good team are all impact on competitions consequence. We should not ignore every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27819548872 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87618309453 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65037593985 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.285807695 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19316691095 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597251121144 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545310794807 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107308120126 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356855617165 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.