mass extinction in the end of the triassic period has three reason which was rejected by lecture.
the reading material provide three possible reasons for mass extinction in the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago. how ever professor rejects each of these reason one by one.
first the author point out that the decline of sea level contribute to mass extinction. however professor refuses this claim by saying that the sea land had the capability of adaptation. so it is correct that a dropping in sea level had proportion in this extinction but it is not enough strong to be considered as a plausible reason.
second the reading says that massive climate cooling has caused the mass extinction. again professor rebutes this reason. professor says it is true that a lot of sulfur dioxide has released by volcanic eruption but in has been in reaction with water in atmosphere and has come back to the earth's surface after a while.it couldn't have stayed for a long time in atmosphere. so it is another unreliable reason.
finally the reading states asteroid strike caused the mass extinction. lecture is in the opposite side. professor declares that the last asteroid collided with earth is related to 12 million years before extinction and apparently i took too long time if it has been the case.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-07 | Rezabozorgpour | 61 | view |
- famous entertainers and athletes are more important for younger people rather older people. do you agree or disagree? 80
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- asking recommendation 40
- for success in future job which is better? the ability to relate well to people or hard studying at school? 66
- young children should be more funded or university student?agree or disagree? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading material provide three possible...
^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
... Triassic period 200 million years ago. how ever professor rejects each of these r...
^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: HOW_EVER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'however'?
Suggestion: however
... Triassic period 200 million years ago. how ever professor rejects each of these reason...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ago. how ever professor rejects each of these reason one by one. first the auth...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ects each of these reason one by one. first the author point out that the decline o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ea level contribute to mass extinction. however professor refuses this claim by saying ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...ea level contribute to mass extinction. however professor refuses this claim by saying ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... land had the capability of adaptation. so it is correct that a dropping in sea le...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...be considered as a plausible reason. second the reading says that massive climate c...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Again
...cooling has caused the mass extinction. again professor rebutes this reason. professo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...n. again professor rebutes this reason. professor says it is true that a lot of sulfur di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... to the earths surface after a while.it couldnt have stayed for a long time in atmosphe...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...e stayed for a long time in atmosphere. so it is another unreliable reason. final...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...e. so it is another unreliable reason. finally the reading states asteroid strike caus...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...e. so it is another unreliable reason. finally the reading states asteroid strike caus...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lecture
...roid strike caused the mass extinction. lecture is in the opposite side. professor decl...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Professor
...ction. lecture is in the opposite side. professor declares that the last asteroid collide...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... years before extinction and apparently i took too long time if it has been the c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 207.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87439613527 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58611627468 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.9867257295 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0833333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 4.19205298013 429% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215205130373 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753714205817 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093263558522 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137596470065 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124761623607 0.0443174109184 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.