As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author of the issue contends that the ability of human to think will be weakened, as people depend more and more on technology to solve problems. This is a claim which I strongly agree with. Among countless reasons which can support my opinion, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that the people's creativity will decrease. In fact, when people do almost all of their difficult tasks by the aid of technology, they cannot use their power of mind efficiently. Therefore, their ability for thinking will be reduced. For instance, by the advent of computers, people prefer to do their sophisticated tasks by taking advantage of computers in order to do them in less time. Thus, they are not obliged to think about them. As a result, their power of invention will be diminished.
Another equally notable point justifying my opinion is that by using more and more of technologies to solve problems, people will be discouraged and disappointed. As a matter of fact, these days nearly all the companies and factories rely on technology instead of people for solving problem. In other words, technologies such as different intelligent machines take the place of human in factories and other work places. Hence, people will lose their confidence and so they will lose their motivation for promotion. That is, they do not have opportunities to thrive their talents and use their mind. Consequently, their ability of thinking will deteriorate.
Although, the aforesaid reasons are the first ones cross one's mind at first, they are by no means the only reasons available. Actually, another subtle point which should be born in mind is that in people will become more lethargic. Indeed, these days almost all people prefer to do their responsibilities by means of technology. Since, they can facilitate their lives and in this way they have more time for pleasure. Thus, they will be lazy and in all of their life aspects they will not be eager to do their jobs by themselves, so by the pass of time their ability of thinking will not be enhanced. According to the noteworthy, refreshingly intelligible statistics released by recent research conducted in our county, nowadays more than ninety percent of people who relies on technology are less creative than people were in the past.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned arguments lead us to the conclusion that the more people relies on technology to solve their problems, the more their power of mind will decrease, but that was a story in a nutshell. Actually, there are some other reasons and examples challenging the claim which are not mentioned above.
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders, a company that constructs new homes."A nationwide survey reveals that the two most-desired home features are a large family room and a large, well-appointed kitchen. A number of h 55
- tpo42 76
- TPO 5 70
- tpo50.integ 3
- 1.In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the stateme 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... account this significant fact that the peoples creativity will decrease. In fact, when...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ability of thinking will deteriorate. Although, the aforesaid reasons are the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99337748344 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121516872 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470198675497 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1252495527 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.347826087 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6956521739 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261550586708 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952927549885 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763120286324 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194895380961 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753782551044 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.