The bar chart below shows the main reasons for students choosing to study at a particular university in the UK in 1985 and 2005.
The graph illustrates what are the reasons for students to make a choice about studying at a specific college in British in the years 1985 and 2005.
The 1985 to 2005 period witnessed a remarkable increase in the percentage of sport, from 12% in the first year to 27% in 2005. As for the trend for teaching, it also shared an upward tendency which rose from around 22% to 26% in the time frame. By the contrast, the number of home and resources both showed a downward tendency. One for home experienced a 7% diminish and ended up with 10%, while the figure for resources decreased by 4%.
Generally speaking, lots of students would always consider the resources of the school first when they chose to study. Moreover, more and more students started to notice about sports than teaching in 2005, while the small group of students would be worried about the distance between home and the university.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-09 | mary.ssherr | view | |
| 2020-11-09 | mary.ssherr | 40 | view |
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people’s reading and writing skills. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- the table described the changed of people who went for international travel in 1990, 2000 and 2005. 78
- Some people believe that only students with the best academic performance should be rewarded, while some other people think it is more important to reward students with improvement. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- the diagram shows the process of how to make smoked fish Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 93
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as a rubbery or a violent attack should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69620253165 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45321550286 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2043952948 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224082916346 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953448104852 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750733680422 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162600906757 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808728123953 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.