the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there is an ever-increasing rate of traffic accidents, raising a concern of traffic safety. Because of this, the issue of how to make road safer for commuters every day is always a topic of debate. Some people think that the sole way to do this is for the government to administer heavier punishments on traffic offenders. While it may be true to a certain extent, I would argue that there are more viable solutions.
It is understandable why some people think that stricter punishment will be effective. The key rationale is that accidents occur because of reckless driving. Therefore, if the government imposes heavier fines or driving bans on drivers who commit traffic laws, the number of serious accidents will significantly decrease. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies the situations, since the drinking and driving law went into effect, alcohol – related accidents have fallen considerably. This is a testament to how stricter punishments contribute to the rise of road safety.
However, it does not always bring desire effects because accidents happen due to supar traffic infrastructure, and poor – quality vehicles. As well as above approach, it would be better for the government to improve road quality by conducting regular maintenance and vehicle inspections to ensure the best road condition for all. In addition, education is another holistic approach, people, especially young adults and teenager need to learn traffic laws, and drivers who want to have driving license have to take a tough driving test at driving schools. These will ensure better results and minimize the risk of accidents.
In conclusion, while it is necessary to give more serious punishments on unlawful drivers, I still believe that it is better to educate people about traffic laws and improve traffic infrastructure and vehicles quality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | alifdores | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | ladungkiet | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | thuyduong896 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | linhnganguyen | 73 | view |
- some people think that huge amount of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 87
- the graph illustrate wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 73
- although more and more people read news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often agreed that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 84
- In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to traffic'
Suggestion: to traffic
...young adults and teenager need to learn traffic laws, and drivers who want to have driv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31506849315 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92710269606 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582191780822 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.732994537 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151740026848 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494763145158 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431594884454 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902180280558 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119114144224 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.