Some people think that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say it can cause the loss of national identities.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
People have different views about the impacts of globalization. Although this development could exert positive influences on national economy, I am of great concern that the preservation of national identities would be deterred.
On the one hand, it is argued by many that cross-border economic and cultural cooperation could be the major drive of national growth. Firstly, increased international trade could create conditions for an economy to grow by leveraging their competitive advantages and boosting their export earnings. The benefit is best shown through robust economic development of net exporters like X country. With the elimination of economic barriers between countries,
X country, a hub of agricultural products, has earned a huge flow of foreign exchange by emerging as the second largest rice exporter worldwide. Improvement in people’s spiritual lives would also accompany. Besides that, borderless cultural contact means that people have chances to get exposed to foreign cultures, whose diversity could enable them to enrich their knowledge and have more choices of entertainment. The popularity of Korean and US – UK music products in Y country could exemplify this point.
On the other hand, I am more of the belief that the uniqueness of individual countries could be under threat as a consequence of growing international cooperation. Multinational corporations could put them in a position to influence local cultural values and promote Western ones in nations having their presence. This is because these Western ideologies could be easily assimilated into local cultures when Western-standard products are marketed and consumers familiarize themselves with new lifestyles these goods create. This might, in the long run, result in a homogeneous set of beliefs and values adopted and the erosion of cultural diversity worldwide.
In conclusion, it is irrefutable that globalization has backed economic and social developments in many countries. However, the danger of losing national identities is also obvious. To avoid such a consequence, I believe that nations need to take actions to preserve their cultural identity through proper education and bolstered social cohesion.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 11
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns? 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast train between cities. others believe the money should be spend on improving existing public transport.Discuss both views a 61
- Research shows that business meetings and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 276, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...cal cultural values and promote Western ones in nations having their presence. This ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69879518072 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15821260621 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617469879518 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 594.0 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.59972833 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131911569742 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043488820588 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239316719821 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744229226593 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152544410359 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.