The graph below shows Houston Gold sales in millions of dollars in 2012.
Given is the chart providing statistical information about the annual proportion of Houston Gold sales in 2012. It is apparent that the overall number of sales fluctuated between 100 million and 350 million dollars.
According to the chart, it is clear-cut that in January the line indicated 200 million which showed a slight increase till February. Since late of February, the figure for sales began to soar dramatically and in March hit the peak at 350 million dollars. During the next 4 months the number of sales dropped by 250 million dollars.
Referring to the line graph, we can also pinpoint that although until October there were significant fluctuations, at the end of the indicated period the line for sales stayed stable which accounted for 200 million dollars.
All in all, the illustrated chart suggests that the most profitable months for Houston Gold were March and April whereas July experienced the lowest number of sales in 2012.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-13 | tramnguyen123456 | view | |
2022-10-13 | tramnguyen123456 | view | |
2022-10-12 | tramnguyen123456 | 100 | view |
2022-09-30 | Blueberry123 | view | |
2022-08-24 | mary.ssherr | view |
- When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out.It is pointless to try keep them alive. 70
- The diagram below shows the development of the village of Kelsby between 1780 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problems 83
- The graph below shows Houston Gold sales in millions of dollars in 2012. 87
- Plan A below shows a health centre in 2005. Plan B shows the same place in the present day. 68
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 157 100
No. of Characters: 777 1000
No. of Different Words: 90 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.54 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.949 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.536 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 42 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 24 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.49 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.756 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.12 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4