Thanks to the development of the Internet that people in this contemporary society have opportunities to shop, work or even communicate with different people worldwide. Although there are a lot of positive aspects of this trend, the negative ones are undeniable due to the lack of face-to-face contact among citizens.
On the one hand, it is clear that the Internet is generally handy in many ways. Firstly, it helps people save time and energy. Just with a few minutes that buyers can choose their favorite products and get it delivered within a short period without going out. It is also simple that children or even the elderly can use it efficiently. Moreover, employees can now work at home through the Internet; therefore, they have more time for families or other types of work. Secondly, the social-networking sites assist people in keeping in touch with their long-distance relationship since making video calls or sending text messages is significantly one of the best ways to maintain those contacts.
On the other hand, there are some drawbacks when people depend on the Internet too much. In terms of real-life relationships, people are less likely to start a conversation in person or getting into a deep talk with their friends or families. In fact, they prefer building online contacts than keeping the real ones around them. Consequently, there are more break-ups and divorces happened recently. From the safety perspective, teenagers, especially the girls, are facing various dangers when using social-networking sites like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and the like. Pedophiles usually adopt false identities that may harm children without the recognition of their parents.
From all the above-mentioned, the development of the Internet has brought both positive and negative aspects to human lives. People should think carefully when using it in order to gain benefits without getting any harms.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 81
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 85
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker. 67
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33881578947 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95856477415 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3017228563 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307726621331 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801949173174 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779930289038 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199395528151 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123867965477 0.056905535591 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.