The charts show information about the number of kilometres travelled in an average month and the distribution of vehicles types in Britain.
The line graph compares the number of kilometers traveled and 3 purposes for traveling in the UK; whereas the pie charts illustrate the changes in use of 5 kinds of vehicles during 20 years since 1990 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the number of kilometers traveled and types of vehicle changed significantly over the time shown.
In 1990, the kilometers used for transport and delivery was at around 6400 kilometers monthly, then it increased sharply to nearly 8000 in the middle years before experiencing a dramatic drop of approximately 2000 kilometers in the end. Meanwhile, personal travel accounted for over 3000 kilometers, about 1000 kilometers a month higher than commuting purpose. Then, the former witnessed a small rise of about 600 kilometers per month in 2000 before falling to just 3000 in 2010, compared to a gradual increase of approximately 700 kilometers monthly of the latter.
Over 20 years surveyed, private cars accounted for the largest proportion, which was at 63% and 59% in 1990 and 2010 respectively. It was followed by the use of trucks, contributed to around one-fourth over two separate years. Neither buses nor motorbikes were merely used in Britain and the figures for the two dropped slightly to merely under 5% in 2010. Other vehicles accounted for just 2% and 3% in 1990 and 2010 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-20 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 88 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Topic Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 54
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both views and giv 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- The line graph shows the cost for watching films The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06306306306 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85694980043 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5060843035 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144127426624 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685937022826 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654462155269 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11260977951 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601530905541 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.