The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
The bar chart illustrates the differences in private house prices in five major cities between 1990 and 2002 compared to the year 1989 average.
Overall, it is clear that the prices changed over the period surveyed. Particularly, house prices in Tokyo and Madrid were lower than that in 1989; whereas London’s house prices experienced the most significant changes.
During the first 6 years, house cost in London and Tokyo witnessed a dramatic drop of nearly 7%; while New York’s house prices just reduced by 5%. However, house prices in Frankfurt increased slightly to around 2%, followed by a rise of approximately 1.5% of house cost in Madrid.
Between 1996 and 2002, London house prices peaked to around 12% above the 1989 average. Homebuyers in New York had to pay significantly more, which prices rising to 5% above the 1898 average; however, house cost in Tokyo saw a slight decrease of around 2%. The cost of a house in Madrid rose a little further to nearly 5% and Frankfurt house prices remained so through the end.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 84
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 67
- The diagram shows the parts of a coffee maker 77
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98285714286 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6179038195 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577142857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8450840005 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395775274232 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205213187954 0.103423049105 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103365805257 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287511973751 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948009621842 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.