Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans

Essay topics:

Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

There are different kinds of classes. Those that are with open discussion and almost no lectures and those with lecture and almost no discussion. Both have their characteristic and importance. In my view, I prefer classes with open discussion between the professor and students and almost no lectures for two reasons.
First, classes with open discussion and almost no lecture are very didactic and this made that students learn faster. During open discussion, every student in class can express different points of view and share new knowledge that were not taught during the lecture. For example, I remember when I was studying dentistry in Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Anatomy classes were an open discussion between students and the professor, we almost did not have lectures. I loved those kinds of classes because I felt that I learned faster. Every student shared their knowledges and opinions. I remember one day the professor made a hard question, each one mentioned an idea until we got the last answer. I always got a high score in anatomy classes because the way that classes were given made me learn easy the subject. As you can see, classes with open discussion allow students to learn faster.
Second, classes with open discussion are less bore. That keeps the student participating actively during the lessons. As a result, all the students would debate ideas and would flow a storm brain. For example, I remember when I was in high school the Math teacher wrote a problem in the board with a few possible solutions, he started reading the problem and every student had to explain what was the correct answer and why the others were incorrect. At the end of the class all of us understood the math problem and at the same time enjoyed the class without get bore. The Math professor always keep us focus in his class. He had a<font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif" size="3"><span style="caret-color: rgb(34, 34, 34); white-space: normal;">&nbsp;hilarious&nbsp;</span></font>way to teach us. This showed me that classes with open discussion are also funnier.
In conclusion, though there are two kinds of classes with their own characteristics. Classes with open discussion and almost no lecture would be better for students to learn faster and do not get bore easily. That is why I prefer them and not the classes with lectures and no discussion.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 hnftskn 70 view
2019-11-07 prayashpathak 73 view
2019-11-03 hilmi 60 view
2019-11-03 hilmi 60 view
2019-10-07 Lao Zhiquan 86 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd almost no lectures for two reasons. First, classes with open discussion and ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ussion allow students to learn faster. Second, classes with open discussion are...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...asses with lectures and no discussion.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19181585678 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.94728511493 2.67179642975 148% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462915601023 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3821915922 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2608695652 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455782117323 0.236089414692 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153282630883 0.076458572812 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134358928365 0.0737576698707 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.341994030394 0.150856017488 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118893485926 0.0645574589148 184% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.