With the increasing population, communication via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past. Agree or disagree?
For years, the society has triggered far-reaching changes in many aspects of our daily lives ranging from business, healthcare, education to communication. The prevalence of the internet-based and technological communication is said to make face-to-face one archaic. From my perspective, I vigorously take issue with this statement as following reasons.
To begin with, virtual communication is of paramount importance in several relationships. For example, in love, oral conversation is indispensable although lovers can contact with each other by social media such as Facebook messenger, viber, line. They need body contact as a hug or a kiss, which is impossibly done in letters or emails and being apart for a long time is utterly not beneficial to a relationship. Moreover, it is common for heavy social network users to feel awkward when trying to strike up conversations with strangers or make small talk about social events. Thus, these people might eventually become socially alienated and suffer from a great sense of solitude.
Furthermore, two crucial aspects, one protecting confidentiality, the other enhancing trust and credibility, make real-life contact the most preferable way of communication. although it is undisputed that the unrestricted access to the internet has greatly benefited the public for its convenience and comfort, data sent via the telecommunication tools including emails, instant messaging, social networks might be prone to be attacked by hackers. internet insecurity is sustainably a downside of advanced communication while virtual contact is prioritized as its privacy. Especially, in business, people prefer real-life conversation because telecommunication is supposed to be inappropriate for negotiation.
To sum up, in spite of the communicating development, virtual conversation sustainably plays a pivotal role in our life and cannot be thoroughly supplanted somehow.
- With the increasing population, communication via the Internet and text messaging, face-to-face communication will become a thing of the past. Agree or disagree? 84
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 84
- environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or individual countries. In other word, it is an international problem. To extent what you agree or disagree? 89
- Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resources such as wind and solar power Others say that oil gas 75
- Woman and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...e most preferable way of communication. although it is undisputed that the unrestricted ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Internet
...ght be prone to be attacked by hackers. internet insecurity is sustainably a downside of...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as, in spite of, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83687943262 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54823340038 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656028368794 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8441959929 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151161079309 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575121207235 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744528261885 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898761132316 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403969039759 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.