The first chart compares the number of marriage and divorce of US citizen from the year 1970 to 2000. The second chart illustrate the marital status of adult Us residence in the year 1970 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the number of marriage was higher in comparison to Divorce over the 30 years periods. Additionally, divorce accounted for the lowest percentage in both years.
The number of marriage begains at 2.5 million in the year 1970 and was stable for 10 years period and decreased 0.5 million up to 2000 which was exactly 2 million. However, divorce rate was increased almost up to 1.5m but again decreased to the same level in 2000 respectively.
Looking more closly to the second chart, married was at the higher position which was 70 percent in 1970 compared to never married and widowed of almost 15% and less than 10%. For instance, Divorced rate was up to 1% in the year 1970. In 2000, married rate decreased slightly at 60% and never married, widowed and divorced was much lesser than married adult americans.
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s actions. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading. 80
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters ( such as food, clothes, and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is imp 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- PTE essay People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving motorcycle sports white water river rafting etc Do you support If yes why and if not why 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost 15% and less than 10%. For instance, Divorced rate was up to 1% in the year 1...
^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r married, widowed and divorced was much lesser than married adult americans.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, look, second, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75690607735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41847634006 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513812154696 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2859017618 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205981621015 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114304209984 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103549754276 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162998083626 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848628241783 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.