Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment
No one can cast a shadow of a doubt on the fact that either providing food for the growing population and protect the environment are so far important. A controversial question is often raised regarding this issue that whether providing food for the population is a more important comparison in protecting the environment. Some people believe that, however, human damage environment in order to provide food for the population, this task is so significant rather that protect the environment. Nevertheless, I strongly disagree with them and I support my viewpoint with two reasons.
First of all, the disturbing environment has so far disadvantageous consequences which in the long run threatened the population. For example, individuals for irrigation, use so much of water of ponds which are habitat for so many species and excessive utilize water lead to drought ponds and they will face with lack of water in the future. In addition, they disturb to the population of floras and faunas' habitat by this activities. another example is that farmers, in order to prevent of destroying their crops by insects, use pesticides which are toxic and these toxic substances, can get into bodies of individuals and make them disease. Furthermore, birds which feed of insects will be killed and even if they can survive, they do not able to product and their population will decline.
Furthermore, they in order to increase their production utilize well-develop technology such as diverse machines. these machines work for fuel which is irrecoverable and constant utilize of them lead to disappear these fuels. If the fuels become finish, they cannot response food for growth-population. The study of Amirkabir university students indicates that the pace of using fuels is more than exploration them in recent years. So, this static indicates that in the future we encounter with lack of fuels. Moreover, by utilizing technology, they make the world warmer because their machines release carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and this substance makes the growth of global warming. In this way, they make the condition harder to reproduce. Therefore, protect the environment is not less important than providing food for human.
To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that protecting the environment is as important as providing food for the growing population. Hence, we can learn that protect environment has so impact on our lives and by perceiving this matter, we will more care about the environment.
- When making major purchase for example car or laptop our decisions can be influenced by different sources of information Explain how each of the following sources of information can influence your decision 1 Recommendations from friends or colleagues 2 In 42
- Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school Others say that children should make these decisions on their own Which view do you agree with and why 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for the government to provide money for things that are beautiful than things that are practical. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern agriculture does damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can cast a shadow of a doubt on t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port my viewpoint with two reasons. First of all, the disturbing environment...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ulation of floras and faunas habitat by this activities. another example is that far...
^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
... and faunas habitat by this activities. another example is that farmers, in order to pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 799, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...duct and their population will decline. Furthermore, they in order to inc...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ir population will decline. Furthermore, they in order to increase their produc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...op technology such as diverse machines. these machines work for fuel which is irrecov...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtant than providing food for human. To sum up, all of the aforementioned rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ng food for human. To sum up, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2128.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24137931034 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02152405418 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509852216749 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0791280436 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3684210526 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.10526315789 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275426163717 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925372457168 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916733432368 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193324854972 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104961906618 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.