Work on projects
In modern day life, people often need to deal with lots of project whether in schools or works. Some people may prefer to work on multiple projects at the same time, while others thinks it is better to finish a project completely before starting another one. To me, I can only focus on one project at one time, so I totally agree with the statement shows in the prompt.
To begin with, if people work on project one at a time, the project can have a better quality. When people are working on just one project, they can have a better concentration on it. Therefore, they can think more deeply and create a better development in their project, and the result will be a better quality of project. For example, when I was in high school, I often need to deal with lots of projects such as biology or history, and I only work on one project at a time. By doing this, I can think more deeply because all of the main points are clear, so I can add more specific informations in my project and lead to a better quality. For instance, I can do more research on the internet and make my project more interesting for the professor to read. As a result, it will be easier when people work on one project at a time. Indeed, people should work one at a time instead of multiple at the same time.
In addition, it can reduce the chance of making mistake when people work on project one at a time. When there are several similar projects such as geography and geology, people can easily mix up with the informations. Take my friends as an example, he often work on several projects at the same time. However, since there are too many similar informations between the subjects, he is often confuse by those informations. Therefore, he often put the details into the wrong project and it even cause him more time to fix these errors. As a result, I told him work on projects as the same way as I do, which is work on only one project at one time. After he start following, he told me that the chance of making mistakes really decrease. So, if students only have to deal with one project at a time, the mistakes can be reduce by having more focus on the project. Thus, working on projects one at a time is more beneficial to people.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that it is better to work on multiple projects at the same time, because it can save people lots of time. However, people will have a better result when they are working on projects one at a time. As a result, I think people should work on a project completely before moving to the next one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...g this, I can think more deeply because all of the main points are clear, so I can add mor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...ails into the wrong project and it even cause him more time to fix these errors. As a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'starts'.
Suggestion: starts
... only one project at one time. After he start following, he told me that the chance o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2073.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 477.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34591194969 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67336384929 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39405471176 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.366876310273 0.524837075471 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.51792114695 341% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7981321472 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1304347826 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7391304348 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446391125231 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219106350419 0.076458572812 287% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130049257371 0.0737576698707 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367937967673 0.150856017488 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404174994809 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 10.9000537634 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.