Students who demonstrate exceptional talent should be given increased educational resources, opportunities, and attention.
I truly believe that in life everyone has its own aptitudes and qualities, and that sometimes we need someone to help us exploit our inner best. Commensurate to this idea, I agree that students who demonstrate exceptional talent should be given increased educational resources, opportunities and attention. However, this does not mean that students who require special attention because they have difficulties in some specific areas, should not receive help.
As I mentioned above, every person is different, has different goals in life and different traits. Educational entities should help students discover these aptitudes and preferences in life, specially during an early stage. Studies have proved that kids in their early stage are exceptionally receptive to new information, and that the first years at school will have an enormous impact in their lives. Therefore, schools should have a “flexible” curriculum for its kids depending on their specific characteristics. This should be applied from kinder garden in school, to master courses in university.
Students that demonstrate exceptional talent should be motivated to continue developing their skills. This applies to any course of action, not necessarily math or physics, but any sport for example. Educational entities should give all available opportunities to ssupport these students and help them exploit their talent. Imagine how much talent is wasted in the world because students do not have the opportunities to develop their skills, or because educational facilities treat every student the same way. For example, if there is a student that is gifted in math, but has no idea how to play soccer, and another student is a soccer super star, but has no idea about calculus, why should they receive the same educational resources and attention? These two student should have their own specific opportunities to develop their talents.
However, the aforementioned does not mean that student who are not “gifted” or “very talented” in a specific area, should not receive special attention if they need to. As mentioned above, educational facilities should have flexible curriculums for students. If there are student that are having trouble with certain topics, schools should provide the required resources to help them. Maybe even by doing so, schools may discover hidden traits in students who did not believe to have any special quality.
To conclude, I believe that all students should be given an opportunity to exploit their best inner self, according to their aptitudes or needs. All students, including exceptional talented students, should be pushed further to reach their ultimate goals in life, by providing opportunities and special attention. Who knows? If properly supported, a non “gifted” student may have a hidden exceptional talent to be discovered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-26 | Martin Giraldo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r lives. Therefore, schools should have a 'flexible' curriculum for its...
^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'students'?
Suggestion: students
... curriculums for students. If there are student that are having trouble with certain to...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55555555556 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09785757107 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485260770975 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5429020962 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372402781362 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12978918537 0.0831039109588 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14147886931 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239211459078 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976070335793 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.