The bar graph illustrates how often the American citizens went to fast food stores over a period of 10 years between 2003 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that most people consumed fast food once a week and once or twice a month over the period surveyed; whereas just a few people had fast food every day.
The percentage of citizens eating fast food daily was only below 5% over the time shown. Then, it was followed by the proportion of those who did not eat fast food, at 5% in 2003 and nearly 4.5% in both 2010 and 2013. The figure for people just ate fast food a few times a year in 2006 and 2013 was followed by the figure for 2003, at 15% and approximately 13%, respectively. 20% of the population went to fast food restaurants several times per week in 2006, then the figure saw a sharp drop of nearly 4% in 2013.
Meanwhile, the percentage of people who ate fast food once a week in 2016 was as high as the figure for those consuming fast food once or twice a month in 2003, at nearly 36%.
- The table below gives information on average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities. 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005. 84
- The plan below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 67
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 89
- The charts show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.25520833333 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23212785213 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.7716637262 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341992985418 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176415112301 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337679565142 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217932430294 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347404742658 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 19.0 40.7170731707 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.