Some people think that the effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause them. Others think that there are better ways to do so. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Industrial pollution is posing to be a serious threat to our environment. As per the recent survey, there is a 27 per cent rise in the factories globally. Thus some people suggest that the best way to tackle industrial pollution is to tax them while others believe that there are a plethora of alternative ways to reduce it. I will elucidate both sides and put forward my opinion.
Firstly taxation is thought to be the most lucrative method to stop industrial pollution as it is commonly believed that heavy penalties will help to reduce environmental contamination. In developing countries like India and China, this strategy had failed to induce any positive results as the factory owners somehow find a way to bribe the local government officials.
On the other hand, I believe that it will not be the taxation policies but the incentive policies which can help to bring positive results in curbing industrial pollution. To elucidate the incentive policies will motivate factory owners and corporates to meet the minimum set standard of carbon emissions set as a guideline. In countries like Turkey where the corporate tax is around 30 %, the local government is providing incentives to a local industry which meet the carbon emission standard by providing them with a reduction of 10% in the annual corporate tax. Similarly, in countries like China and Japan, companies are converting toxic waste into electricity and thus this electricity is bought exclusively by the government at a higher rate to support the cause of reduction of industrial pollution.
To conclude as per the above explanation it is evident that the introduction of incentive policies will prove to be a more effective way than implying taxation policies to reduce environmental pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-28 | vinshu koul | 67 | view |
- some believe that modern technology has made people less socially active, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- You have recently moved to a different house. Write a letter to a friend. In your letter1) explain why you have moved.2) describe the new house.3) Invite your friend to come and visit. 73
- Your office building doesn't have parking available.Write a letter to the manager. In your letter:Explain the problemSuggest a solutionSay why parking will benefit all employees 78
- You have some repairs to do at home, but there is a restaurant next to your house. Write a letter to the restaurant manager and say:- What repairs are you going to do?- How will it affect the restaurant?- Provide a solution for the inconvenience. 73
- You bought a music concert ticket. However, you are unable to go. So you offer the ticket to your friend.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:•Explain detailed the concert.•Why you are unable to go•How can your friend receive the ticket. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...er cent rise in the factories globally. Thus some people suggest that the best way t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, similarly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15972222222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999273203 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2136213438 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.090909091 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210807324173 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798360400667 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829083906935 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131824916627 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774138094828 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.