Some people think that the effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause them. Others think that there are better ways to do so. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Industrial pollution is posing to be a serious threat to our environment. As per the recent survey, there is a 27 per cent rise in the factories globally. Thus some people suggest that the best way to tackle industrial pollution is to tax them while others believe that there are a plethora of alternative ways to reduce it. I will elucidate both sides and put forward my opinion.
Firstly taxation is thought to be the most lucrative method to stop industrial pollution as it is commonly believed that heavy penalties will help to reduce environmental contamination. In developing countries like India and China, this strategy had failed to induce any positive results as the factory owners somehow find a way to bribe the local government officials.
On the other hand, I believe that it will not be the taxation policies but the incentive policies which can help to bring positive results in curbing industrial pollution. To elucidate the incentive policies will motivate factory owners and corporates to meet the minimum set standard of carbon emissions set as a guideline. In countries like Turkey where the corporate tax is around 30 %, the local government is providing incentives to a local industry which meet the carbon emission standard by providing them with a reduction of 10% in the annual corporate tax. Similarly, in countries like China and Japan, companies are converting toxic waste into electricity and thus this electricity is bought exclusively by the government at a higher rate to support the cause of reduction of industrial pollution.
To conclude as per the above explanation it is evident that the introduction of incentive policies will prove to be a more effective way than implying taxation policies to reduce environmental pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-28 | vinshu koul | 67 | view |
- You recently organised an all-day event for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback , participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but there were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.letter to a manage 84
- You have recently started work in a new company.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter explain why you changed jobs describe your newjob tell him/her your other news. 78
- You are applying for a job and you need a letter of reference. Write a letter to a former boss.In your letter• Describe the job you are applying for• Say what you want to be included in the reference letter• Request that your former boss se 78
- You have just received a credit card statement from your bank The statement lists a number of expensive purchases that you are sure you did not make Write a letter to the bank manager In the letter Introduce yourself Explain that you did not buy the items 95
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...er cent rise in the factories globally. Thus some people suggest that the best way t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, similarly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15972222222 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95999273203 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.2136213438 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.090909091 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210807324173 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798360400667 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829083906935 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131824916627 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774138094828 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.