The diagram below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. People's reasons for using the car in city.

Essay topics:

The diagram below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent. People's reasons for using the car in city.

The pie chart illustrates the detail about, the modes of transportation using in Edmonton, such as: car,LRT,bus and taxi. However, the table shows the purpose of travelling car in the city. The data has been calibrated in percentage.

Overall, it can be seen that, car is the most preferable mode of transport by the masses, but, commute to work is the major concern of using car in the city.

After minute concentration on this circular chart, it is evident that, the car is considered the most preferable mode of transport by the individuals, which stood at 45%. Followed by, Light Rail Transit it is accounted for 35%. Furthermore, in Edmonton the data of using car and taxi is same at 10% respectively.

Turning to the table, the highest usage of car by person's, in the city for commute to work stood at 55 percentile. Although, in terms of shopping and leisure activities, the usage of car is same in both the cases at 15% sequencely. Meanwhile, for business prospective car is used 45%, but , in case of taking children to school these figures are slightly less.

Votes
Average: 10 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 hackerman0147 56 view
2020-01-05 Carry_42 73 view
2019-12-31 Manolito 73 view
2019-12-02 Ali Elameen 73 view
2019-10-25 Anand9526 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , LRT
...ortation using in Edmonton, such as: car,LRT,bus and taxi. However, the table shows ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...he city for commute to work stood at 55 percentile. Although, in terms of shopping and lei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...usiness prospective car is used 45%, but , in case of taking children to school th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79032258065 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85217802743 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586021505376 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0529649339 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252799600194 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100451009745 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603371897475 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165345276135 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214951813129 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.