asteroids are good for three reasons
The article states that asteroids are the best way of colonization and provides three reasons. However, the professor explains that sending people to an asteroid it is not a practical idea and have downsides.
First, the reading states that due to of low gravity landing spaceship in asteroids would be safe. The professor refutes this point by standing that low gravity represents a risk for people's health because would lead to decrease muscles density and as a result, produce health diseases.
Second, the article claims that asteroids have many precious metals that would have a profitable because the value of them. However, the professor contends that availability of these metals seems to be a profitable idea, but it is not the whole picture. He says that the cost of transport the metal is not easy. Also, the price of the elements does not guarantee the metals would be sold, increasing the supply in the market and reducing the metals that are sold.
Finally, the reading avers that asteroids are good for colonization because is very easy to reach. The lecture opposes this point by standing that even the asteroids are easy to reach, is very difficult to return from. He mentions that orbital pass is very unusual and even the asteroids are closer to the Earth travel back would be a challenge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 93 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 32 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
- twins studies 40
- It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?" A person should never make an important decision alone 60
- It is better save money for the future Do you agree or disagree tha statement 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5593831941 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518018018018 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0201382914 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8181818182 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194192377598 0.272083759551 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748003446795 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762136994357 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116370029254 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662125890645 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.