The given table illustrates the proportion of national expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three various item in the year 2002.
As can be seen, the expense on food, drinks and tobacco was highest rate in the case of all countries also compared with other two items. Turkey had the greater expenditure on foods and tobacco amounting to 32.14%, whereas it is only 6.63 percentage of clothing and footwear, while 4.35% only spent for free time and education. The percentage of cost allocated for eatables and smoking by the Ireland 28.91 as against 6.43 allowed for fashionable things, also 2.21 only in entertainment and schooling.
On the other hand, it is interesting to note that the amount spent by Sweden for food, drinks and tobacco was 15.77, which is thrice as amount spent for dress materials and shoes in the same. With a difference of 12.29% nutrition and alcoholic had a clean dominancy over the textiles and sandals, its spending was 6.51% by Spain however only 1.98% dedicated for leisure and education.
Over all it is cristal clear from the table the Turkey was soent more cost for all different goods consider with other countries also the five nations use higher cost for consume food, drinks and tobacco then the least amount spent for relaxation activity and learning.
- The bar chart below shows the no of research students studying different subject in 2005 87
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 61
- Task 2: Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 56
- The number of tourists visiting Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003 is presented below.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagrams below.Write at least 150 words. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...the expense on food, drinks and tobacco was highest rate in the case of all countries also ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97285067873 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4830046175 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565610859729 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3243965404 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.0 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117742747847 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054271293608 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056001083791 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821561018786 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488245409084 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.