Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. this is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom. what are your opinion on this
Cigarette smoking is injurious to health. Smoking will not only put the smoker in danger but also others as well. The government has banned smoking in public places and some private organizations from office premises. This indeed, put individual freedom into question but in long run will prove beneficial. This essay discusses the impact of smoking on health and benefits of smoking restrictions.
First of all, smoking has become an inevitable part of some people’s life and unknowingly passive smokers are also getting affected by the tobacco in the air. For example, some People often tend to smoke after a hectic day in the office or public places. As a result, passive smokers like pregnant women, children, elderly people may get affected by the wreaking havoc of tobacco. In the same vein, tobacco smoking may lead to lung cancer, mouth cancer and also to other deadly diseases in long run.
In contrast, every individual has rights for freedom. Freedom to do things they wish to. But intentionally or unintentionally causing damage to health cannot be acceptable. More specifically an unhealthy population is a burden for the parent country. Nerveless, the same applies to a private company as well. To be more precise, Tobacco is a bane for people and the country.
A major advantage of the smoking ban is that it will gradually improve the health of people and eventually contribute to increasing GDP of the nation. In other words, the money governments are spending on smoking-related health problems can be effectively used for other development. From the point of view of the economy, this can be beneficial in both the health sector and other areas as well.
From my perspective, smoking restrictions have a lot of advantages over disadvantage. So the smoking ban on public places and office premises will prove beneficial in long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | jencydalphy | 87 | view |
- Food can be produced much more cheaply, with the use of improved fertilizers and better machinery. However, some methods may be dangerous for human health and have a negative effect on local communities. To what extent do you think its disadvantages outwe 78
- Plastic shopping bag contributes to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think that they should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below shows the population for India and China since the year 2000 and predicts population growth until 2050. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- test 61
- test
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by the tobacco in the air. For example, some People often tend to smoke after a ...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... eventually contribute to increasing GDP of the nation. In other words, the money...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll prove beneficial in long run.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, for example, in contrast, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13071895425 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88061097748 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6765497045 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264370930963 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820116712609 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851639998321 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152078863084 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941350037299 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.