Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The world is changing quickly. People are less happy than before.
As the society becomes more and more advanced, our daily life changed, there is no doubt because the higher pressure we may feel less happy, but on the other side we also have more new ways to find happy. From my perspective, I will hold disagreement toward this question.
To begin with, technologies enable modern people to spend their leisure time in diverse way. What would you usually do for relaxing? Go to a cinema to watch a movie? Go to a theme park to play with exciting entertainment facilities or play the online game with friends? People are given more options so that easier to find the best way to have fun. However, in the past, only have choices of reading book or listing the radio.
Nevertheless, communication equipment improves the communication efficiency between people, bringing the bonds among families and friends. In the past people only can choose writing letters or face to face chatting. If a friend move away from the town, he may lose contact with his friends. Because of undeveloped communication technologies, friends must be those people in close physical distance with you. But now, you just need connect in the internet, your millions net friends are waiting you, they maybe have different jobs and living in different country. And you have various ways not only sending messages but also meeting them through the scream to chatting. The communicating equipment let us know—I’m not alone.
In addition, a robust welfare system allows people spend more money on amusement today. Putting a priority on the public policy, the government reduced the taxes, using the classifying system to make sure the lower and middle classes have more money, building the educational medical finance system make parents don’t need to worry about the children education cost and patients don’t struggled to cure the sick, also reducing the price for amusement. For example, during the spring festival, the ratio of a movie ticket cost to income around 1%, but in the past the ratio is higher than today. The stronger welfare system gives people confidence to have fun.
To conclude, the technologies give people options to find happy, the communication equipment cut out the distance between people, and the robust welfare system support people to have fun. So I think people today are more happier than before.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The world is changing quickly. People are less happy than before. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to ask decisions for them; today young people are batter able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 66
- Do you agree or disagree: the advertising is the only main cause of unhealthy eating habits? 60
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 63
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to write'.
Suggestion: to write
...nds. In the past people only can choose writing letters or face to face chatting. If a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uipment let us know—I'm not alone. In addition, a robust welfare system all...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...o have fun. So I think people today are more happier than before.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, i think, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.0286738351 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06443298969 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65276557844 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590206185567 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6591709795 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4761904762 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143285630963 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453910101405 0.076458572812 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426993017029 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808212567011 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442117479849 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.