Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic.
In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
You should use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an alarming rise in the number of people struggling with their addiction to fattening products. The issue of whether governments should impose a higher tax on this type of unhealthy food has triggered intense debate. In my opinion, it seems to me that this proposal is essential.
To begin with, I contend that the excess of eating fast food poses a great threat to human life. As a result of the overconsumption of fattening food products, it is easier for us to get obesity. Under this circumstance, an oversize body may carry a certain degree of risk to our health either physically or mentally. It is responsible for low work efficiency and impairing body coordination. On top of that, fast food consumers, particularly women, would be obsessed with the image and losing weight, which may lead to low self-esteem. Therefore, it can be concluded that it is imperative for governments to take a regulation for restricting fast food into account.
There are two main reasons why imposing an additional tax on fast food products is a feasible remedy. First of all, children seem to reap the associated benefits from this proposal when it comes to dietary habit. In the present day, the emergence of childhood obesity truly hits home owing to the over-indulgence of parents as well as the cheap price of fattening food. Secondly, the amount of tax gained from the imposition of a higher can be allocated to relieve the heavy burden on the healthcare industry since the growing number of people suffering from the consequences of unwholesome food. All in all, it is promising that an increase in fast food tax probably may have a positive impact on the young generation along with the national economy.
For these aforementioned reasons, I agree to a great extent that governments ought to impose a higher tax on the fast food industry. It is prime time to take action before fattening products exacerbate the obesity epidemic.
- The increase in food production owes much to fertilizers and better machinery, but some people think that it has a negative impact on human health and community. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 92
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 89
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ces of unwholesome food. All in all, it is promising that an increase in fast food tax proba...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as a result, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, on top of that, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91940298507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89723599086 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.68034758 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199991219744 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597073859344 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435728593176 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109115482659 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532102598604 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.