Tacking decisions is considered one of the most important aspects in our lives. We are living in very dynamic world and we are dealing with a lot of issues all day long. Some people I am sure would agree that it is agree idea that leaders should take quick decisions, while others would disagree. However, when it comes to me I totally disagree that leaders should take fast decisions. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will demonstrate in the following essay.
To begin with, tacking quick decisions can hurt other people. Recently, we have to take a lot of decisions at our lives and these decisions are very importat to our lives. For instance, last summer I had an internship at a multinational company. Moreover, this company was preparing to release new product to the market. In fact, the leader decided to provide the product to the market without any promotion. In addition, he did not ask the other coworkers about their opinion. So, the company could not sell a lot of the product and the company lost a huge profit. Furthermore, many coworkers could not get their salaries. On the other hand, if this leader gave himself enough time to think about the market strategy, the company would be able to achieve the target. As you can see, leaders who take rush decision can hurt others people.
In addition, tacking quick decisions is very stressful. Nowadays, we can take a lot of decision everyday and we have to deal with many problems in our lives. For example, my husband and I were in rush when we were choose our daughter major. In fact, we decided to let her join the pharmacy school without talking to her first. Furthermore, we did not give us enough time to know her interests and her abilities. In fact, my daughter did not like the biolgy. As a result, she felt in the first class and she blamed us that we are the reason behind her failure. Nevertheless, if we gave us enough time to think about our daughter career we could make the right decision.
In sum, I agree that leaders who take quick decisions are wrong. This is because quick decisions can hurt other people, and because tacking quick decisions is stressful.
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- TPO 38 Integrated writing 52
- TOEFL T P O 34 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...people I am sure would agree that it is agree idea that leaders should take quick dec...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 97, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...Nowadays, we can take a lot of decision everyday and we have to deal with many problems ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...husband and I were in rush when we were choose our daughter major. In fact, we decided...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in addition, in fact, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63446475196 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46313616994 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480417754569 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0883317614 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.0 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.32 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575074882242 0.236089414692 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.017771015241 0.076458572812 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196701061971 0.0737576698707 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040858610931 0.150856017488 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033045911234 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.