Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Over the past few decades, the world has seen an upsurge in the trend of people travelling worldwide in order to widen their knowledge. However, some people argue that we can still learn about different cultures due to the convenience of the internet. In my opinion, it seems to me that travelling plays a significant role in understanding one country or culture.
In an electrical and computer-based world, the internet becomes an invaluable research tool. Thanks to it, we have access to an almost unlimited source of knowledge and information, thus we are able to develop our global perspectives. Yet, the internet has greatly altered the way that we perceive the world. However, reliance on the internet can turn out to be problematic, because it is difficult to verify the information on online newspapers as well as social media. The urgency of unscrupulous journalists publishing misleading stories with sensational headlines and distorted truth has truly hit home in recent years, leading the public to a stereotype towards one culture. Therefore, it can be concluded that the potential downsides of media and the internet should be taken into account.
On the other hand, there are three primary reasons why travelling is the most effective way to comprehend a culture. First of all, doing as the locals do for a long time gives us access to two different cultures. Consequently, we are able to integrate a new culture into our identities, which builds the bridge to harmony and understanding between different cultures and countries. Secondly, experiencing a cultural event by ourselves is, in all probability, easier to memorize its unique features in comparison with watching on the TV news. Finally, travelling enables us to learn from accurate and reliable knowledge, such as local tour guides who was born and grew up in that particular place. All in all, it can be concluded that travelling is a key factor that helps us enrich our background of knowledge.
In conclusion, it is my personal belief that exposure to distinct cultures during travelling abroad offers us ample opportunities to broaden our minds and horizons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 89 | view |
2019-06-25 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 89 | view |
2019-02-15 | zentirot | 90 | view |
2018-10-30 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Someland's main exports in 2005, 2015, and future projections for 2025. 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Comments
Some people think that
Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most of their time on school studies. Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views.
Which view do you agree with? Why?
Whether youngsters should start their official learning and study hard in their early life or mainly play on that time is a controversial issue. In my opinion, education plays a greater role in kids development and as early they start studying as more educated they will be in the future.
On the one hand, while playing games kids gain different essential skills which is important for their proper growth. While playing actively the children strength the muscles, acquire fine motor skills and develop social abilities. For example, according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization children should spend at list 60 minutes every day for active playing for their health benefits.
On the other hand, a good education is a basement of children career and it will be more beneficial if people start studying at a very early age. That will give them the opportunity to gain more and more knowledge and skills. For example, different studies show that bilingual children who started to learn different languages simultaneously while they were very little become more intellectual in their older ages than those who studied only one language.
I agree with the opinion that early education is a key element of a successful career and future because as early children learn how to study as easy will be for them later. For example, nowadays many school curriculums include two years of foundation studies. In that time the school children receive huge information and build ground for their future study in the school.
In conclusion, people are divided into their opinion regarding spending more time playing or learning in childhood. In my opinion, regardless of the advantages of playing in early life the early education still is a key for a better life in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16045845272 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02091352184 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607449856734 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8396956251 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228903924701 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661814779797 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481407289415 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126569280197 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511214862113 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.