Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
Currently, with advancement in technology the globalization is at its peak. There is growing trend to travel abroad to get knowledge about the country but opponents hold the opinion that the all concerned data is already available on television and internet. Thus, traveling abroad to seek knowledge has become a hot topic of today. This essay will discuss both views before reaching some reasonable conclusion.
On the one hand, to learn about other nations by visiting the place is much more effective in several ways. First and foremost, experiencing the sight live gives better knowledge than just watching it on computer or television. In other words, pictures on screen are not as effective as personally observing the real place. Being present at the place gives better idea about environment, culture, traditions and local customs. For example, by visiting the historical buildings can help people to grasp history of the country deeply. It is also worth mentioning the importance of communicating with the local residents. Visiting the place also give you an opportunity to live with the local family such as home stay, this provides clear vision of nation’s culture. Personal experience allows one to differentiate between the culture of foreign country and his native country.
However, some people believe that Internet is more convenient option to know about background or history of county that attracts them. To enumerate, not everyone can afford travelling expenses to go abroad. Evidence can be found easily among the modern society as people fail to squeeze the time to have a holiday due to the heavy pressure from work or study and the fast paced lifestyle. Hence, watching TV and learning from the Internet turns out to be a good way to learn other culture. Not only it broadens one’s minds, but also it helps people save a lot of money by just sitting in front of TV or computer.
To recapitulate, if financially feasible, it is better to travel abroad to learn about another country, it is more sophisticated way than learning from internet or television. Studying the country by visiting it gives better experience and understanding of the new culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | Prabhjot Sanghera | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | zentirot | 90 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls. Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that government should subsidize fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper Others argue that tax should be set on unhealthy food Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to travel'.
Suggestion: to travel
... To enumerate, not everyone can afford travelling expenses to go abroad. Evidence can be ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, thus, for example, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1568627451 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8200258375 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577030812325 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7751782079 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8947368421 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294298160834 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790582834841 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055407472868 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175543125175 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541120135304 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.