the chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart illustrates the levels of donation among people of different ages in Britain between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, a greater percentage of British people gave the amount of money to charity in 1990 than in 2010. However, across the two years, the pattern contradicts after the age of 50.
In 1990, 42% of the 36-50 age-group made a charitable donation and this figure makes up the highest on the chart. The 18-25s contributed the least at only 17%. By 2010, these figures had fallen significantly to 35% and 7% respectively. People aged between 26 and 35 experienced a decrease from 31% to 24% in 2010.
While donations up to the age of 50 declined across the two years, people from 51-65 age-group rose from 35% to nearly 40% which was seen as the highest percentage for 2010. There was a slightly higher among the oldest group aged over 65s, at 35%, than the 1990 figure of 32%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-17 | annatran12324 | 56 | view |
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 11
- the graph below shows the average carbon dioxide emissions per person between 1967 to 2000 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- writing task 1 The pie charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 84
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 743.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67295597484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50398203496 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0558727555 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5555555556 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166016572307 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733447675716 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597548470094 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117569565305 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306611420069 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.