The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors to England who went to four different tourist attractions in Brighton between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of visiting the Pavilion and the Pier increased over the period of 30 years while the figure for other attractions in Brighton fell.
In 1980, the Festival was the most popular attractions for visitors to England. Although having the highest percentage at 30% in 1980, this figure had fallen slightly to 28% by the year 2010. The percentage of visitors who went to the Gallery stood at 22% in 1980. After 5 years, it reached the peak of 37%. However, this figure then declined to 20% in 1990. Throughout the remainder of the period, the figure continued to drop sharply to under (less than) 10% in 2010.
As it can be seen from the graph, the proportion of tourists visiting the Pavilion in Brighton had the starting figure at approximately 25% in 1980. In 1995, this figure reached its highest point at 50% before plunging to 30% in 2010. Despite fluctuations, the proportion of visitors traveling the Pier rose from 10% in 1980 to over 20% in 2010.
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or video. 95
- The line graph shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80303030303 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62737447327 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520202020202 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6526238541 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2572664774 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970085172817 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138738961503 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20678735528 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164610225681 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.