Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Different schools of thought proposed that there should be generalized repacaution of similar types of offence. Although some school of thoughts contradicts this notion, and believes that circumstances which lead to offence committed should be taking into consideration. This essay will discuss both perspectives so as the writer's opinion.
To begin with, a standard punishment for certain crimes helps eradicate corruption, reasons because an individual can't influence or tamper with the already stated law. Moreover, generalized consequences brings about equality, this enables every individual to be aware of what repercaution to expect after engaging in illegal dealings, or inability to abide with rules and regulations.
On the other hand, having to know what led an individual to dabble into a particular offence brings about empathy. An individual may steal grocery due to insufficient money, however the person in question might have been a job seeker for a while without an improvement. It has also been heard of when specific individuals do what displeases them just to be validated by their peers. Late last year, a boy was caught while attempting to burglar a house after intensive investigation, it was found that he had to do it in order to join a notorious cultist group. If a standard ranking system for crime was used, not considering what led the boy to the theft, It's possible to have the same punishment for a wanted car thief for over a decade.
In as much as both perspectives has their pros and cons a more suitable punishment should be referred too. I would go with the school of thought that a generalized punishment should be adopted mainly because, It's open and stated in the law. Every committer of an offence would be aware of what awaits them irrespective of the situations that led them into it. This wont only inform the general public, but would as well reduce crime rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-02 | Sai Kiran | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | jaspreet aur | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Randa Agha | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | brandey | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | learnafren | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Write abaut the following topic:Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person's culture andcharacter from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.You recently organised an all-day meeting for your company, which tookplace in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said thatthey liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food 78
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 84
- The internet has greatly increased our access to information. To what extent do you think this is a good thing?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.You should spend about 40 minutes on this t 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on thisYou work for an international company, You have see an advertisement for atraining course which will be usefulWrite a letter to your manage in your letterdescribe the training course you want to doexplain what the 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ill discuss both perspectives so as the writers opinion. To begin with, a standard p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rruption, reasons because an individual cant influence or tamper with the already st...
^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...them into it. This wont only inform the general public, but would as well reduce crime rate.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06329113924 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87822327203 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0945311554 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311420570581 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992592996257 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589798025585 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175796643467 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281832573008 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.