The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The shown graph compares figures of different types of meat and fish consumption during 25 years. The image analyses the measure in grams per person per week. Overall, the fish intake reached its higher number at the beginning of the period, in 1979 with almost 60 grams per individual. during the presented time, the marine meat consumption slowly decreases till it reached the rate under 50 grams in 2004.
The most striking detail is lamb meat consume suffered a down from 150 grams per head to around 60 grams in the last illustrated year. but this category is not the only one, because the amount of grams asked by people who had used to prefer beef meat dramatically decreased too. In 1979 in one week the demand for this category was more than 200 grams per person and till 1984 it had not just a decline of almost 40 grams, but it had also a rise in the next year, of almost 60 grams per human. but this fact did not help for a long time because till the year 2004 came, the beef consumption ended under 130 grams per person.
In conclusion, as it can be seen, just the chicken consumption had an increase of almost 100 grams from under 150 to almost 250 grams. For sure, this category it suffered over the time different changes like the others.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-18 | olParya | 73 | view |
2019-09-03 | nhaxquyeen | 89 | view |
2019-04-17 | armiez | 78 | view |
2019-03-31 | Dương Văn Biên | 73 | view |
2019-03-06 | hieu1910199512 | 73 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of silkworm and stages in production of the silk cloth. 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: During
...79 with almost 60 grams per individual. during the presented time, the marine meat con...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... 60 grams in the last illustrated year. but this category is not the only one, beca...
^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...ext year, of almost 60 grams per human. but this fact did not help for a long time ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4652173913 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23107881201 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560869565217 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9179906984 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919081734631 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484786459865 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048394776375 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723994738307 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459766850458 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.