The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

These two tables point out the turnover of bananas and coffee in terms of euros in European countries respectively.
As can be seen in the figures, variations of sales of bananas and coffee between 1999 and 2004 in the UK were the most value. The rest of sales displayed uptrend except revenue of bananas in Sweden and Denmark.
To observe this table in more detail, sales in the UK increased significantly from 1.5 million in 1999 to 20 million in 2004 and the revenue of coffee in 2004 in Switzerland was twice as high as in 1999. On the other hand, sales volume on bananas in Switzerland surged to 47 million euros which was three times than in 1999. Except for the above analysis, there was a slight decrease in Sweden and Denmark by 0.8 million and 1.1 million respectively.
In conclusion, the UK increased the demand of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas dramatically from 1999 to 2004.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-21 Pham Mai Nguyet 56 view
2019-12-25 el-naz 67 view
2019-10-08 Sri Wahyuningsih 73 view
2019-08-31 Sonya Hsieh 78 view
2019-07-10 Tran Mai Phuong 84 view
Essays by user hhhiiirrr :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, except for, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 745.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74522292994 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81411913424 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7415144283 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216841524766 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109824987399 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616540822353 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148670612973 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356306822111 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.